Poor organization usually presents itself in the form of redundant
information that pops up in several paragraphs of a paper.
A revision checklist won't help here. Solving the problem of
redundant information takes grunt work.
Here are links to earlier pages about revision, in case you missed
them:
To see if they have redundant information, students lay body
paragraphs 1 and 2 in front of them. They read the first sentence
of body paragraph 1. Then they read body paragraph 2 looking for
another place where they said the same thing.
If they don't find any similar sentences, they read the second
sentence of body paragraph 1. Then they read all of body paragraph
2 looking for ideas that are similar to that sentence. They have
to read in that back-and-forth fashion through the entire paragraph
first paragraph.
If they find ideas that are repeated, they have to move repeated
ideas into one paragraph. It doesn't matter which paragraph
they choose as their dump site. All they are trying to do is group
the related ideas together.
When they finish body paragraphs 1 and 2 and dumped all the repeated
information into one or the other, they need to do the same
process with another pair of body paragraphs, for example
paragraphs 2 and 3.
They must repeat the process until they have compared each
body paragraph with one other. At that point, they will have
all the related ideas grouped in paragraphs.
Then they have to get rid of repeated ideas. If they have
one idea in their essay three times, they need to get rid of two
of those sentences. They can cut them out or rewrite to use the
best sounding parts of the sentences.
This kind of revision is a tedious, time-consuming process.
Only the most dedicated writers will do it even once, no matter
how many times their revision checklist says to do it.
A better alternative: avoidance
For nonfiction writers, the cause of redundant material in the
essay is overlapping points in the writing
skeleton. That means students can almost always avoid
having to do painstaking revision by making sure their writing
skeleton points don't overlap.
In other words, you need to convince students to revise in
the pre-composition stages of the writing process. If you
can convince students to do that, you'll see a great improvement
in the organization of student essays.
How do you convince students to revise as they go along?
Importance of trial and error
Some students will try revising during the planning stages of
writing because the teacher said to do it. Most students, I fear,
have to learn the hard way. They either
-
Write disorganized essays on which they get a failing grade,
or
-
Write disorganized essays from which they are saved from
failure by being walked through the tedious process described
above.
As much as it grieves me to say it, no amount of inspired teaching
is ever quite as effective at developing skill in the application
of the writing process as personal trial and error.
The remaining two problems that writers have to address during the revision
stage of the writing process concern development and coherence.
For those issues, students can again use a revision checklist
developed from their writing process tools and strategies.
Published 18-May-2009; updated 15-Jun-2010