The remedy for not knowing content is different than the remedy
for not following procedures. You will waste your time and your
student's time if you prescribe for the wrong problem.
Context for self-monitoring
Give your entire class strategies that work most of the time
for most people. For example, teach students how to use a
thesis maker to create a working
thesis. That's a strategy that works for almost every nonfiction
writing situation for almost every student.
Struggling students may do an activity, but struggling students
won't check to see that they did it correctly. When problems
crop up, as they certainly will, deal with the problems by helping
the student do a self-assessment.
Struggling students often know why they had a problem but don't
trust their own assessment of a situation. Your task is to help
them identify problems so they can address them.
Check student's strategy knowledge
The first time or two you'll have to prompt use of the student
self-assessment procedure. We'll use Caitlin as an example.
Begin by checking Caitlin's working thesis. If she messed up,
you need to get Caitlin to identify why she had difficulty.
Say something like, "It looks as if you had some difficulty
making this thesis builder work. Let's see if we can figure out
how to make it work for you. What was the very first thing you
did?"
Try to get Caitlin to explain what she did and the order
in which she did the tasks.
Ask Caitlin to explain why she did that particular thing.
You may want to have her show you where she put information or
the step in a set of directions she was following. Sometimes a
student has simply misheard or misread something.
Listen for explanations that don't make sense if the student
understand the terms correctly. Inability to get things in the
correct place or correct sequence if students correctly understand
the terms could indicate a true learning disability.
Check student's learning procedures
If Caitlin's understanding of the strategy seems sound, check
to see if she has some bigger problems. From observing a student,
you probably have an inkling of likely problem areas. You might
ask questions like these:
-
Did you allow enough time to use the thesis
builder?
-
Did you spend too much time trying to make one assertion
sound good?
-
Did get busy thinking about something else and forget
about building thesis statement?
-
Do you think you made enough trial thesis statements
to come up with a good one?
- Did you get frustrated or angry with yourself when
you couldn't get a good thesis right away?
Such questions reveal problem areas that are not restricted to
writing, such as time management, inattention, and a low frustration
tolerance level.
If Caitlin indicates something might have been a problem, follow
up with questions to get her to find one or two possible ways
to prevent the problem in the future. It's unlikely that you'll
solve Caitlin's problem this way, but it is at least a starting
place.
If you see a couple students have the same general learning problems
(difficulty handling frustration, for example, or procrastination),
you should build some positive
self talk for dealing with those issues into scripts you model
in response to writing problems.
You are probably thinking that this sounds more like a student-teacher
conference than student self- assessment. You are right.
That is why they need your help before they can move into the
student self-assessment mode.
In my experience, most students in the regular school population
can move to self-monitoring after you've helped them with one
or two basic problems that hamper them as writers. You may have
a month or even two when feel as if the wicked witch transformed
you into a special ed teacher, but if you can hang on, I think
you will find students resolve their issues and you'll be back
to normal duty again.
Assessment of the quality
of their writing product is a less difficult process
for students.
Published27-Oct-2009; updated 09-May-2010