Many people think good reading comprehension produces be good
writers. Like so many popular beliefs, that one contains just
enough truth to be dangerous.
It is true that good writers are usually good readers,
but reading good writing even reading with good
comprehension may not produce good writers.
Training someone to understand an engineering document is not likely
to make that person a good sonneteer, is it? Nor is reading Jane
Austen likely to boost Caitlin's ability to write biology lab reports.
For reading and writing to have reciprocal benefits, a person
must read and write material written in the same genre.
Please note that exposing students to good reading or
good writing is not the same thing as teaching reading
or writing.
Expository reading is required
In English language arts courses, we tend to concentrate on reading
imaginative
literature. We may overlook the fact that all our
students must read and write expository prose, not imaginative
literature.
Everything from the chapter introductions in their algebra book
to social studies discussion questions are
expository prose. In those authentic reading
situations, students display their reading skill by using
the information in some way.
Expository reading is valuable
Because expository
nonfiction is so vital to our students' academic and workplace
success, it should be the primary focus of middle school and high
school reading
comprehension activities.
You and I may not find that factual material particularly interesting,
but the ordinary kids in our classes value expository
writing more highly than the creative literature we enjoy.
We shouldnt throw out the novels and poetry because students
dont value them. Nor should we skip teaching students how
to read that material. However,