Grading papers is a necessary part of teaching. Good grading
practice requires you to give feedback that promotes student learning
along with the grade.
In a school system, we cannot get away from grades and grading.
We can, however, reduce the misery of grading and boost student
learning.
Here are some practices I use when giving feedback to my students.
Read through the list to see which you could borrow or adapt
for your classes.
Don't use red ink to grade papers.
Purely from a psychological standpoint, nobody likes to see red
ink on their papers. You can use just about any color for your
feedback comments except red.
Limit your focus to your objectives.
A big reason we teachers hate grading papers is that we try to
look at everything.
Good teaching and grading practices call for giving feedback
on fewer but more important issues so as not to overwhelm
students or overwork ourselves.
Embed your objectives in grading rubrics.
If you link your rubrics to your course objectives,
you make it easy to focus on giving feedback only on writing elements
you are teaching.
Having course-specific grading rubrics is especially
helpful if you teach courses at different grade levels. Forgetting
which standards apply to which course does not rank among the
top 10 grading practices!
Give students copies of assessment rubrics.
One of the best grading practices is to make sure students know
what they are being graded on.
I give students copies of my grading
rubric when I begin discussing the material that
will use that rubric. I make a a big deal of pointing out
that that the rubric is my outline for what I'll teach and what
students need to learn.
Keep a sense of proportion in your rubrics.
Another one of the grading practices I find helpful is to indicate
on the assessment rubrics the percentage of total points for
each writing component.
I keep the same proportions throughout the year but make
each paper worth a larger portion of the students' grades as they
gain experience writing. (See a persuasive
essay rubric showing my grading proportions.) For example,
an early paper might be worth 50 points, while an end-of-course
paper might be worth 300.
Proportional grading seems to me to be a fair compromise
between maintaining my standards and giving students time to learn
what they need to know to earn a good grade.
Proportion grading time to grade proportions.
If you've decided that the content of a paper is worth 70% of
students' grades, then you should spend 70% of your grading time
giving feedback on the paper content and 30% giving feedback on
everything else.
You won't convince students that writing is all about delivering
good content clearly if the only comments they see from you have
to do with the size of their margins.
Avoid overweight assignments.
Having too much of students' grades dependent on a single assignment
is unfair to them and to you.
My personal grading practices avoid high-stakes situations by
requiring students to, in effect, earn a certain grade ranking
on three essays in a row before I consider them to have
earned that grade. View
a sample objective designed for assessment by the three-in-a-row
standard.
Use symbols to note your initial reactions.
If you give students authentic writing assignments relative to
your class content, you are obligated to assess the ideas in the
paper before you assess how well the paper is written.
As you read a piece for its content, you can mark passages with
signs that indicate how the ideas strike you as you read
through:
+ for a good piece of evidence
- for factually wrong evidence
? for some evidence whose accuracy or interpretation
you question
This simple system may keep you from jumping to conclusions and
wasting time giving feedback that is not warranted.
Let me give you an example.
Josh and Caitlin may exhibit the same problem in their essays
about To Kill a Mockingbird, but the one problem
may have different causes in the two cases. You may see that
a question you had about paragraph 2 is answered later in Josh's
paper. You had the same question when reading Caitlin's paper,
but she didn't cover the point anywhere in her paper.
You realize Josh needs feedback about his organization, but there's
no use giving feedback to Caitlin about better organization because
her problem is that she didn't understand the novel. Your feedback
to each student should be different.
Do not correct errors or edit papers.
Correcting and editing are the
writer's jobs. If you do the writers' work, they won't learn to
do it themselves.
Think of it this way: a writing assignment is a test. Does the
math teacher work every problem for students who get the wrong
answer? Of course not. The math teacher assesses, grades and reteaches
as necessary.
Make your comments useful
When you are giving feedback on students' work, you should not
only encourage students to continue working toward better skills
but give them specific ways to improve their grades.
I recommend you offer two suggestions on each assignment:
Practices that result in improvement over the long
term include such things as checking the writing skeleton
for overlapping elements or employing strategies for developing
evidence.
Practices that could pay off on the next assignment
are things such as following the directions or editing
for one serious error at a time.
Giving students one suggestion that gives a quick grade boost
builds your credibility. If you have a couple of good ideas in
a row, Josh and Caitlin might be willing to try one of your long-range
suggestions.
Find something good to say.
You should always find something positive to say about the student's
work. (This is the point at which you show your creative writing
skills.) Don't praise shoddy work or improvement that's not happening.
If you can't think of anything positive to say about the writing
itself, look for positives such as
Students may seem to go through the motions of writing for months
until something clicks and they start writing.
Make students do some of your prep work.
To save me time, I have students insert copies of the rubrics
into papers they submit electronically. Thirty seconds
saved on a paper isn't much, but if you're grading 50 papers,
the savings amounts to 25 minutes. Also, students can't say they
didn't know the evaluation standards if they have to insert the
form into their papers.
If students aren't turning in work electronically, you have
students complete the identifying information and turn the rubrics
in with their papers.
Your repertoire of practices
for teaching writing should include techniques for giving feedback
on students' writing mechanics.
Published 06-Jul-2009; updated 15-Jun-2010