Under US Copyright laws, the Internet is treated like other forms
of publication.
Many people incorrectly assume that anything they find on the Internet
is in the public domain and can be safely copied and shared.
Legally,
what would be copyright infringement if the material is taken
from a print publication is also a copyright infringement if the
material is taken from an Internet publication. The same penalties
apply regardless of where the copyrighted material was taken from.
Pickup in the parking lot analogy
A pickup truck in a municipal parking lot is the best analogy
I can think of to explain copyright laws when Internet sources
are used.
Let's say Homer the Hometown Handyman parks his pickup truck
full of tools in the municipal parking lot. The tools are sitting
out where anyone can take them.
Since the pickup truck full of tools is out in the open in the
publicly owned parking lot does that give you the right to take
one of Homer's saws without his permission? No, it does not.
Would it be OK for you to use one of Homer's saws without his permission
if you were going to use it to do a job for your church or some
other not-for-profit organization? No, it would not.
The written content, images, music, and computer programs you find
on the Internet are the intellectual property equivalent of Homer's
saws. The fact that they are "parked" in clear public
view on the Internet doesn't make them public property.
What does using material mean?
Like many other terms in the English language arts curriculum,
using material has a different meaning within the context
of a discussion of copyright laws for the Internet than
it has in everyday conversation.
Let's go back to the pickup truck analogy. If you were to take
one of Homer's saws and try it out on your kitchen table, you would
say you had used the saw.
Similarly, if you found on the Internet Homer's article on how
to use a handsaw, downloaded it, and read it on your computer,
you'd probably say you had "used that material."
In the normal conversational sense of the them use, you
did use Homer's material. However, you did not used Homer's
material in the legal sense of the term as it applies to intellectual
property.
What changes what we conversationally call "using material"
into a situation that falls under copyright laws? When
the Internet is the information source, the trigger is sharing
the material you copied with someone else. If you let someone
else see or hear copyrighted information, you are using it.
In other words, in the eyes of the law you use Homer's
article if you do such things as
-
Attach a copy to an email you send to someone.
-
Copy Homer's photograph of a handsaw into a paper are writing
about tools.
-
Quote information from Homer's article in a term paper you
are writing.
-
Paraphrase information from Homer's article in a term paper
you are writing.
-
Summarize information from Homer's article in a term paper
you are writing.
Please note my list doesn't include all possible ways of using
material, just a few common ones.
Implications for students
Students can save to their computer or a storage device materials
for their personal study or research without violating copyright.
However, students must not share all or part of that information
with anyone else without giving credit to their source. It
they use even a small portion without appropriate credit they
are guilty of plagiarism;
if they use a larger
portion without prior permission they are guily of infringing
copyright laws; whether Internet or non-Internet sources
were copied makes no difference.
Created 10-Aug-2009; updated 22-Jan-2010